The e106 system is designed to improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and transparency of the Section 106 review process by providing federal agencies with an electronic submittal system that serves to expedite a critical step in Section 106 review and encourage complete and accurate submissions that can be shared with others. Read the announcement regarding the availability of this system.
I. Name of agency (If multiple agencies, state them all and indicate whether one is the lead agency):
Indicate the federal agency carrying out the Section 106 review. (For some HUD projects this could be the "Responsible Entity" pursuant to 24 CFR Part 58.) If there are multiple federal agencies involved, please indicate whether the agencies have designated a lead agency for the Section 106 review process for this undertaking. If so, please note whether the non-lead agencies will continue to have any Section 106 responsibilities for the undertaking.
2. Name of undertaking/project (Include project/permit/application number if applicable):
State the name of the undertaking. This is commonly the name on your NEPA document. If the agency
also uses a permit, grant, or application number, please provide that.
3. Location of undertaking (Indicate city(s), county(s), state(s), land ownership, and whether it would occur on or affect historic properties located on tribal lands):
Indicate the location of the undertaking—state(s), city(ies), county(ies) (or other locational information
if relevant), and whether it will take place on, or affect historic properties located on federal and/or tribal
and/or state and/or private lands. If the undertaking is on, or affects historic properties on tribal lands, list
the relevant tribe(s).
4. Name and title of the federal agency official and contact person for this undertaking, including email address and phone number:
Indicate the federal agency official (per section 800.2(a)) for this undertaking, along with the agency
contact person(s) and their phone number and e-mail address, with whom we should correspond if we
have questions about the undertaking, the documentation provided, and/or the status of the Section 106
5. Choose one purpose of notification.
Indicate whether the submission of documentation is intended to notify the ACHP of the federal
agency’s finding of adverse effect (Section 800.6(a)(1)), whether the agency intends to invite the ACHP
to participate in the consultation to resolve adverse effects (Section 800.6(a)(1)(i)), or the agency is
proposing to develop a Programmatic Agreement (project PA) for complex or multiple undertakings in
accordance with 36 C.F.R. 800.14(b)(3).
6. Describe the undertaking and nature of federal involvement (if multiple federal agencies are involved, specify involvement of each):
Briefly describe the undertaking subject to Section 106 review, and the nature of federal involvement. Explain whether this project will:
7. Describe the Area of Potential Effects:
Describe the area of potential effects (APE) for this undertaking. According to section 800.16(d), the APE is “the geographic area or areas within which an undertaking may directly or indirectly cause
alterations in the character or use of historic properties, if any such properties exist.” Maps, photographs and/or drawings may be included to aid in describing the APE.
8. Describe steps taken to identify historic properties.
Describe the steps taken to identify historic properties within the APE, including who was consulted in developing the “reasonable and good faith” identification strategy.
9. Describe the historic property (or properties) and any National Historic Landmarks within the APE (or attach documentation or provide specific link to this information).
Describe the historic property or properties that may be affected by the undertaking, including photographs, maps, and drawings as necessary. Are there any National Historic Landmarks (NHLs) within the APE? This description should include information on the applicable National Register criteria of significance (e.g., A - D), character - defining features, integrity, boundaries, and environmental setting and geographic location if they contribute to the property’s significance. Please note that a more detailed description of the affected historic properties may be attached to the form. If this information is already on a current National Register or state register form, attach that form.
10. Describe the undertaking's effects on historic properties.
Describe the undertaking’s effects to the historic property or properties. An effect is defined in section 800.16(i)) as any “alternation to the characteristics of a historic property qualifying it for inclusion in or eligibility for the National Register.”
11. Explain how this undertaking would adversely affect historic properties (include information on any conditions or future actions known to date to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects).
Explain how this undertaking would adversely affect historic properties. State any currently known conditions or future actions to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects. As set forth in section 800.5(a)(1)) an adverse effect is found when “an undertaking may alter, directly or indirectly, any of the characteristics of a historic property that qualify the property for inclusion in the National Register in a manner that would diminish the integrity of the property’s location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, or association. Consideration shall be given to all qualifying characteristics of a historic property, including those that may have been identified subsequent to the original evaluation of the property’s eligibility for the National register. Adverse effects may include reasonably foreseeable effects caused by the undertaking that may occur later in time, be farther removed in distance or be cumulative.”
(Note that if NHLs may be adversely affected by the undertaking, the regulations (at section 800.10(c)) require the federal agency to notify the NPS and invite their participation to resolve adverse effects.)
12. Provide copies or summaries of the views provided to date by any consulting parties, Indian tribes or Native Hawai'ian organizations, or the public, including any correspondence from the SHPO and/or THPO.
Provide copies or summaries of the views provided to date by any consulting parties or the public, including any correspondence from the State Historic Preservation Officer(s) and/or the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer(s).
13. Please indicate the status or any consultation that has occurred to date.
Are there any consulting parties involved other than the SHPO/THPO? Are there any outstanding or unresolved concerns or issues that the ACHP should know about in deciding whether to participate in consultation?
14. Does your agency have a website or website link where the interested public can find out about this project and/or provide comments?
Please provide relevant links.
15. Is this undertaking considered a "major" or "covered" project listed on the Federal Infrastructure Projects Permitting Dashboard or other federal interagency project tracking system?
If so, please provide the link or reference number.
16. Attach supporting documentation.
Indicate whether the files are Section 106 consultation correspondence, maps, photographs, drawings, and/or plans, additional historic property information, or something else.